66
6
The Nature of Information
In much human communication, it is the context-dependent difference between
explicit and implicit meaning that is decisive in determining the ultimate outcome
of the reception of information. In the latter example of the previous paragraph, the
context—here provided by the physical environment—endows the statement with
a large complement of implicit information, which mostly depends on the mental
baggage possessed by the recipient of the information; for example, the meaning
of a Chinese poem may only be understandable to someone who has assimilated
Chinese history and literature since childhood, and will not as a rule be intelligible
to a foreigner armed with a dictionary.
A very similar state of affairs is present in the living cell. A given sequence of
DNA will have a well-defined explicit meaning in terms of the sequence of amino
acids it encodes, and into which it can be translated. In the eukaryotic cell, however,
that amino acid sequence may then be glycosylated and further transformed, but in
a bacterium, it may not be; indeed it may even misfold and aggregate—a concrete
example of implicit meaning dependent on context.
The importance of context in determining implicit meaning is even more graph-
ically illustrated in the case of the developing multicellular organism, in which the
cells are initially all identical; according to chemical signals received from their
environment, they will develop into different kinds of cells. The meaning of the
genotype is the phenotype, and it is implicit rather than explicit meaning, which is,
of course, why the DNA sequence of any earthly organism sent to an alien civiliza-
tion will not allow them to reconstruct the organism. Ultimately, most of the cells
in the developing embryo become irreversibly different from each other (differen-
tiation), but while they are still pluripotent, they may be transplanted into regions
of different chemical composition and change their fate; for example, a cell from
the non-neurogenic region of one embryo transplanted into the neurogenic region
of another may become a neuroblast (Sect. 14.9.2). The mechanism of such trans-
formations will be discussed in a little more detail in Chap. 14, but here this type of
phenomenon serves to illustrate how the implicit meaning of the genome dominates
the explicit meaning. This implicit meaning is called epigenetics, 26 and it seems
clear that we will not truly understand life before we have developed a powerful way
of treating epigenetic phenomena. Shannon’s approach has proved very powerful for
treating the problem of the accurate transmission of signals, but at present we do
not have a comparable foundation for treating the problem of the precise transfer of
meaning. 27
Even at the molecular level, at which phenotype is more circumscribed and could
be considered to be the function (of an enzyme), or simply the structure of a protein,
there is presently little understanding of the relation between sequence and function,
as illustrated by the thousands of known different sequences encoding the same type
of structure and function, or different sequences encoding different structures but the
same type of function, or similar structures with different functions.
26 Cf. Sects. 14.9.2 and 14.9.3.
27 Given that translation (from nucleic acid to protein) is involved, the proverb “traduttori traditori”
is quite apt.